PC Infinity's Archiver

Pazu 發表於 2008-11-15 00:48

New toy :P

Thx Nissin #vamp#

herman 發表於 2008-11-15 08:45

why not f2.8 ??
差2級光圈 #hehe#

我好很76 發表於 2008-11-15 10:27

siusiupak #ai_yo#

Pazu 發表於 2008-11-15 11:18

[quote]原帖由 [i]herman[/i] 於 2008-11-15 08:45 發表 [url=http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=117620&ptid=2105601][img]http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
why not f2.8 ??
差2級光圈 #hehe# [/quote]

Money is not the problem #whistle#
but comparing both lens F4L is much sharper than F2.8L
also the weight of F2.8L is too heavy esp for travelling
I was very headache to decide buying 2.8L or 4L before and finally made the decision of 4L
the IS of 4L is really wonderful and the weight is only half of 2.8L
and the image is definitely sharper for 4L

kelvinlok 發表於 2008-11-15 11:30

[quote]原帖由 [i]Pazu[/i] 於 2008-11-15 11:18 發表 [url=http://pcin.sytes.net/discuz/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=117626&ptid=2105601][img]http://pcin.sytes.net/discuz/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]


[size=7][color=Red]Money is not the problem[/color][/size] #whistle#
but comparing both lens F4L is much sharper than F2.8L
also the weight of F2.8L is too heavy esp for travelling
I was very headache to decide buying 2.8L or 4L be ... [/quote]
#adore#
應該買晒兩支, travelling就4, 平時用2.8#drool#

Pazu 發表於 2008-11-15 12:00

[quote]原帖由 [i]kelvinlok[/i] 於 2008-11-15 11:30 發表 [url=http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=117627&ptid=2105601][img]http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

#adore#
應該買晒兩支, travelling就4, 平時用2.8#drool# [/quote]
You really know my thought haha
later maybe really buy 2.8L :P
but buy 4L first lor hehe

Pazu 發表於 2008-11-15 12:02

from 31August till yesterday
100-400 F4.5-5.6L
Markin Q3 ballhead
100 F2.8 MACRO
50D
85 F1.8
70-200 F4L IS

killer 發表於 2008-11-15 16:21

就黎仲有5D MK II~~

頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.