AS ceramique vs GC-2
尋日買 O左支 GC-2今日就用佢來跟 AS ceramique 比一比 測試平台 ~
硬件
Intel Q9450 @ 400 x 8 (3.2GHz)
Gigabyte X38-DS4
CM Hyper TX2 (底板 voltage 速控)
變態的動畫公仔一隻 (optional)
軟件
平台 Windows 7 - 7137 x64
Core Temp 0.99.4 x64 呢個係 TEST O既中途 (AS ceramique 已經沿用了一年多), 拆走 HEATSINK
為 O左唔好有 AS ceramique 殘留 O係 HEATSINK 同 CPU
我係會先用紙抹走 AS ceramique, 再用 CONTACT CLEANER 噴, 再用火酒抹多次先落 GC-2 測試結果 ~
AS ceramique Idle / Full-load GC-2 Idle / Full-load 文字化
AS ceramique Idle : 48 / 46 / 48 / 49 (average: 47.75)
AS ceramique Full-load : 76 / 71 / 68 / 69 (average: 71)
GC-2 Idle : 45 / 44 / 45 / 46 (average: 45)
GC-2 Full-load : 67 / 63 / 68 / 70 (average: 67)
最後, GC-2 的確比 AS ceramique 涼 3 - 4 度
下次要換散熱油時, 不妨考慮一下 GC-2 咁我無用散熱油…死緊 AS5 好似係比 AS ceramique 強一點 幾錢?
同有冇break in period [quote]幾錢?
同有冇break in period
[size=2][color=#999999]電親個腦 發表於 2009-6-1 12:12 PM[/color] [url=http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=135078&ptid=2107422][img]http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
$51 [quote]
$51
[size=2][color=#999999]杰仔 發表於 2009-6-1 12:21[/color] [url=http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=135081&ptid=2107422][img]http://www.pcinhk.com/discuz/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
咁大枝,都幾抵用{:3_113:}
頁:
[1]